rugbyunion
Latest News:

Opinions expressed on this message board are solely those of the individual author. No endorsement of such opinions by the editors, Sportnetwork or Sale Sharks can or should be inferred.


Old Boy Christian Day on new plans for longer season
18 September, 2017 17:06
..... some senior players are considering striking according to the Torygraph.

Day's first essay in writing (see what I did there?) is worth a read:-

[www.talkingrugbyunion.co.uk]



https://c8.staticflickr.com/9/8657/27965002623_47115a2ac7_t.jpg

 
Re: Old Boy Christian Day on new plans for longer season
clutch (IP Logged)
19 September, 2017 12:43
There comes a point where enough is enough. I'd fully back them striking. The quality of our domestic product is driven in some way by having fully fit and available superstars. Burning them out just seems ridiculous.

 
Re: Old Boy Christian Day on new plans for longer season
HaleShark (IP Logged)
28 September, 2017 17:58
There's been some good articles of late about player burn out, M.V. at Sarries open to a pay cut to play less games, clubs concerns about an extended season and now we have D.Y. at Wasps saying he's had to trim his squad to keep within the cap. I think the biggest concern and surprise there is that Wasps actually take note of the salary cap! They have cut their squad from 45 to 40 players. We have a squad of 32.

[www.bbc.co.uk]


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net
 
 

Who is online?

Total users online:  

Most users online:  

Users on this site:  

Where are they?