Latest News:
We are The Warriors! The Mighty Worcester Warriors!

This message board is for all things Warriors' and Rugby.
When posting please be aware that posts may be read by youngsters and respect other posters.
Click Here for the Message Board Rules

Barf v Tiggers
w4rriorz1980 (IP Logged)
09 April, 2018 14:42
I'm all for "home" games @ HQ. I realise it's a money making exercise for the RFU as I'm sure they made more revenue out of it than Bath or Tigers did,(correct me if I'm wrong) but @ this stage of the season with Bath trying to break into the top 6 wouldn't it have been more beneficial to have played the game @ the Rec?
Surely more chance of beating Tigers there?
Obviously Bath would've had some input but does the RFU have the final word on such matters?

Eats,Shoots And Leaves

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/04/2018 16:17 by w4rriorz1980.

Re: Barf v Tiggers
Garym (IP Logged)
09 April, 2018 15:03
My understanding was that this was all down to Bath and nothing to do with the RFU. It is the greed of bath and wanting to promote their brand in London as there are lots of exiled county set to keep happy. Mind you they could go the whole hog and recreate themselves as London Bath in reading, which would give them the bigger stadium they have always wanted.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing

Who is online?

Total users online:  

Most users online:  

Users on this site:  

Where are they?