Are you sure you want to report this post?
Re: Clark Report
Posted by: Sometime lurker
Date: 30/03/2012 21:46
I may regret this, but this is my one and only comment on the subject.
As a Saints fan, I have trouble reconciling Calum's account of events with what you can see and hear on the video. They do not appear to match.
That said, I can see how he may have acted, without the intention to break Hawkin's arm; a ruck is a fluid situation.
Then we come to the judgement. If the act was unintentional then why the long ban? Remember, this is a 64 week ban reduced to 32 of an act that was apparently unintentional - i.e. 64 weeks for what Blackett apparently decided was an "accident"
As with almost all of the hanging judges "judgements", the verdict seems unrelated to the evidence, and the sentence unrelated to the verdict.
You may optionally give an explanation for why this post was reported, which will be sent to the moderators along with the report. This can help the moderator to understand why you reported the post.