rugbyunion
Latest News:

The jury has reconvened


By Leipziger
January 19 2016

Dean Richards has not always been the most popular figure on the Kingston Park terraces, mostly due to a poor Premiership win ratio. I’ve always been a supporter of his.    

Under Richards, the Falcons were promoted to the Premiership at the first attempt, and stayed up at the first attempt (just about), before improving massively in 2014/15. So everything was looking good for more progress this season.

 

I didn’t expect the Falcons to finish in the top four in 2015/16, or perhaps even the top six, but I hoped that we’d keep playing the way we did in 2014/15 and win more games, making steady upward progress.

 

Just as any honest fan would admit that the Falcons made progress in 2014/15 compared to 2013/14, I have to concede that the first four games of 2015/16 suggested we’d gone backwards, and I am concerned about what Richards and pals were thinking during this period.

 

A negative style of play (that couldn’t simply be explained by the absence of Sinoti Sinoti and Juan Pablo Socino) culminated in the horrific home defeat to Exeter and a shocking first half at Worcester.

 

Things improved with the draw at Sale, and the games against Leicester, Bath and (for the most part) London Irish showed sparks of hope, as our attacking game began to come back together.

 

I am completely discounting the Russian trip in this article, because I’ve been meaning to write this since after the Irish game and I’ve only just got around to it.

 

This article comes in response to a post that somebody (I don’t remember who) wrote after the Irish game. This fan suggested that if we are relegated, Dean Richards should leave, and if we stay up, then Richards should stay because he is doing good work in developing young players. For me, it isn’t that simple, and more than our league position, Richards’ position should come down to how the team approaches the rest of the season.

 

To explain why relegation isn’t the be-all and end-all of a coach’s position, consider this: the Falcons could end this season with 15 points, gained from negative, defensive, defeatist rugby, and stay up. Or we could finish the season with 25 points, gained from a free, attacking and daring game, and go down. This is because we cannot, except for the two games we play against them, influence what London Irish do.

 

If the first few games of 2015/16 were a blip and we are going to approach the rest of the season positively, then it suggests the coaches will have learned their lesson about how we are most likely to win games and league points. So even if the Falcons are relegated, I’d stick with them. To get rid of Richards at this point, especially if you believe he is doing well in developing young players, would not be a decision for the club’s long-term future – it would be gratuitous punishment. Cutting off our nose to spite our face.

 

If the Falcons are going to play negatively for the rest of the season, and hope to stay up by not losing games, then even if we do stay up then I might be inclined to make a change. Why? Because it shows that the coaches don’t have the confidence to play an attacking game when in a relegation fight, when there is absolutely no reason not to.

 

Lets not have anybody spouting that garbage about us having to play a negative game because of the threat of relegation. In 2013/14 a negative gameplan got us 22 points, and in 2014/15 an attacking game brought 34 points (not to mention bigger, happier crowds). Anybody who has ever read a league table knows that a team are more likely to avoid relegation with 34 points than 22.

 

Of course, whether I believe Dean Richards and pals are the best people for the job doesn’t make any difference, Uncle Semore will make the decision. But I like to be positive and I don’t want to feel like the Falcons are going in the wrong direction. So hopefully we’ll have an enjoyable rest of the season, playing the right way that is most likely to bring wins, and if relegation happens, it will only set us back one season.

 

The best case of all of course is that the team rediscover their attacking mojo, crack on and stay up for another go at the Premiership next year. I believe that’s what we’ll see.

 

Come on Falcons!

View a Printer Friendly version of this Story.

Bookmark or share this story with:

The jury has reconvened
FalconsRugby.org.uk (IP Logged)
19/01/2016 21:01
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.

 
Re: The jury has reconvened
rubyrhone (IP Logged)
20/01/2016 11:11
Very measured summing up Leipy. I would say the verdict is "not proven"yet.Hopefully we have not too much more suffering to come.

However I would like to know why players like Hammersley, Catterick Socino and Harris seem to have been reined in. They were so different last season. I would rather see the team playing to win rather than not to lose. We seem to lose anyway, so might as well give everyone their heads and not stifle natural instincts.

 
Re: The jury has reconvened
Running Rugby (IP Logged)
20/01/2016 11:50
I have mentioned the complete drop off in attacking rugby that won us so many fans last season. As rubyrhone says, what has happened to the likes of Catterick, Socino, Hammersley and the rest who played with such freedom last season.

Catterick cannot even get near the starting fifteen when everyone is fit.

 
Re: The jury has reconvened
Monkey1 (IP Logged)
21/01/2016 16:31
I am still keeping the faith on this one but I have no idea why. After a disappointment I might go off on one but when I calm down again I always come back to the same thought process. Semore knows the club inside out. He is not a distant & part time owner, he is in the thick of it. He knows things about the club's situation that we can't even begin to guess, and with the benefit of all this he feels Richards is the man for the job. There is an obvious implication, that he feels other people would not get as much from the resources that we have.

I trust Semore's judgement more than I trust my own, and that I suppose is that.

 
Re: The jury has reconvened
bulmer22 (IP Logged)
22/01/2016 20:06
This season is testing everyone's patience. Injuries have crippled us. So to continue playing like we did last season has proved impossible. Plus inconsistency of performance of some players. I honestly don't know, on form, what is our strongest team.

I went to Leicester on boxing day and for the first 20 minutes we played well. But we have not played well for 80 minutes for a long time. Looking around at Welford Road,, I kept thinking what chance have we got, against these clubs with a strong fan base or wealthy benefactors. I'm not knocking our owners here because Semore is doing an incredible job. The academy is producing a crop of promising players that shows how strong rugby is in the region. But it is not a level playing field, and I despair that it will always be so, where clubs in the North struggle to compete in the Premiership.

I just hope we can get some form back and turn this season around. I don't think it's down to any change of tactics as such. It's just a set of circumstances that are stacked against putting out our strongest team.

Please lets try to be positive and keep supporting the club. At the end of the season we can all discuss what went wrong and what came right.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net
 

Newcastle Falcons Poll

Is this a poll

See results > Submit >>