Whither
Rugby?
Over the next few weeks I’ll be publishing a series of articles based on my analysis of Zurich Premiership crowd numbers in the professional era.
We will look at each club in some detail. However, before the first article is published I feel it is important to understand the rationale behind the figures. This I have covered in some detail in a separate article The Figures Explained.
Room
for Growth?
If
there is one thing that screams out at me from these figures it is that (lack
of) ground capacity is the biggest problem facing our sport today. The problem
is most acute at Bath, but also is an issue at Gloucester, Harlequins, Leicester
and Northampton. All of these clubs have recently expanded the capacity of their
grounds. In every case this added capacity has been quickly swallowed up.
Sell-out
crowds are no bad thing, but when, as in the case of Bath, you are turning
customers away for almost all your home games you have to ask if it is viable to
stay in your ground, no matter how attached to it you are, as a club. Had Bath
the ground capacity to permit growth, it is arguable they would now have an
average crowd of 15-20k rather than the 9.6k they have recorded in the 2003/4
season.
Some
five years ago Rob Andrew chaired a commission looking at the future of
professional club rugby in England. When they reported, one of the key
recommendations was that the minimum ground capacity for a ZP team should be
10k. This was widely ridiculed at the time but with the benefit of hindsight
appears to have been about right. One wonders what figure a similar commission
would come up with today, especially if it looked five years into the future. I
would hazard a figure somewhere close to 20k. Cue shouts of anguish from those
clubs who, even if they had the money and their local councils allowed them to
develop their grounds fully, could not meet this requirement, and would be
forced to move.
The
RFU and EPR are aware of this issue. In December 2003 they presented a paper to
the government proposing that a rugby trust be set up to help fund ground
development in the same way that a football trust was set up in the wake of the
Hillsborough disaster. This appears to have fallen on deaf ears, perhaps because
rugby simply doesn’t carry the political clout that soccer does. Given the
seeming lack of progress of this initiative, the only viable option for several
clubs appears to be ground-sharing at soccer stadia.
The
future looks bright – for some
Professional club rugby in England now appears to be growing steadily and healthily, although this has not always been the case. There were falls in average attendances in the two seasons following 97/98. The corner was turned in the 00/01 season, however, with the most significant growth being between that and the 01/02 season. Given that the 00/01 season was a Rugby World Cup one I do wonder if that had a part to play in the turnaround. Whilst things do look good at present, we might be unwise to take continued growth for granted. On the other hand, the clubs and the sports administrators should take account of and plan for future growth. Failure to do so would be foolish to say the least.
| Season | Average Crowd | Growth on Previous Season |
| 97-98 | 6764 | |
| 98-99 | 6398 | -5.4% |
| 99-00 | 6097 | -4.7% |
| 00-01 | 6321 | 3.7% |
| 01-02 | 7536 | 19.2% |
| 02-03 | 8286 | 10.0% |
| 03-04 | 8468 | 2.2% |
| Average Growth | 4.2% |
There
are in general more ups than downs in these figures. The greatest success story
of them all is the growth that has been achieved by London Irish. By some way
they top every comparison table, weighted and non-weighted, total percentage and
absolute numbers. In the 97/98
season their average gate was 3,718 the second lowest of the clubs surveyed,
only just ahead of Sale on 3,618. Six seasons and two stadium moves later their
average crowd is now 10,657, the third highest in the country in un-weighted
comparisons, second in weighted ones. In the 2003/4 season they twice had crowds
in excess of 20,000 and currently hold the record for the largest ever Zurich
Premiership crowd of 20,840 against Bath on 21st March 2004.
It
should however be noted that large crowd sizes do not necessarily relate to
profitability. London Irish, whilst they own their old ground at Sunbury, play
in the Madejski stadium at Reading. There are greater direct costs and reduced
revenue opportunities as a result of tenancy rather than ownership, although
these may be balanced by not having to service capital debt arising from
ground-expansion or acquisition. London Irish are expected to report a slight profit for the first time in the professional era this season. In achieving this
they are behind several other clubs, some with much smaller home crowds.
Unquestionably,
Leicester have been the Kings of English club rugby throughout the professional
era. Since records began they have been comfortably ahead of all other English
clubs. Their average gates are currently in excess of 16,000, well ahead of any
rivals. They are however one of many clubs who face issues with ground size.
Given how rapidly and consistently London Irish have expanded their supporter
base over the years and the fact that with a 24k capacity at their Reading home
they have plenty of room left for expansion it is this author’s conjecture
that within three to five years Leicester will be knocked off the top spot, for
the first time.
The
club with perhaps the greatest area for concern is Saracens. They are the only
one to record a drop in attendances during this period. Some of this can be
attributed to crowds in the early part of this survey being somewhat inflated
due to promotional giveaways, etc. Even here it is not all doom and gloom, as an
average crowd of 7,241 puts them firmly mid-table when it comes to attendances,
and they achieved a slight growth in numbers last season, attendances having
fallen in each of the three years prior to that.
We will continue this series with a look at each club in some detail. This will start with the club who currently appear to have the toughest job on their hands; Saracens.
Bookmark or share this story with: