Saracens
Something aint Working in Watford
For a full explanation of the source of and rationale behind these figures please refer to The Figures Explained.
| Season | Average Att. | Position (Out of) | Weighted Position | Final ZP Position | Percentage Growth |
| 97-98 | 9303 | 2nd(10) | 2nd | 2nd(12) | |
| 98-99 | 9226 | 2nd(10) | 2nd | 3rd(14) | -0.8% |
| 99-00 | 7251 | 3rd(10) | 2nd | 4th(12) | -21.4% |
| 00-01 | 9222 | 2nd(11) | 2nd | 5th(12) | 27.2% |
| 01-02 | 8388 | 4th(11) | 2nd | 10th(12) | -9.0% |
| 02-03 | 7157 | 7th(11) | 6th | 8th(12) | -14.7% |
| 03-04 | 7234 | 8th(12) | 6th | 10th(12) | 1.1% |
| Variation '97 - '04 (1997/8=100%) | 78% | 12th(12) | |||
| Crowd Growth Absolute | -2069 | 12th(12) | |||
| Average Growth | -3.0% | 12th(12) |

2003/4 Season
| 2-May-04 | ZP | Saracens vs Sale | 39 - 23 | Vicarage Road | 6917 |
| 3-Apr-04 | ZP | Saracens vs Gloucester | 16 - 8 | Vicarage Road | 6907 |
| 22-Feb-04 | ZP | Saracens vs Newcastle | 32 - 27 | Vicarage Road | 7516 |
| 15-Feb-04 | ZP | Saracens vs Northampton | 18 - 22 | Vicarage Road | 5651 |
| 1-Jan-04 | ZP | Saracens vs Leeds Tykes | 27 - 3 | Vicarage Road | 9350 |
| 27-Dec-03 | ZP | Saracens vs Bath | 15 - 24 | Vicarage Road | 11477 |
| 30-Nov-03 | ZP | Saracens vs Rotherham | 29 - 10 | Vicarage Road | 5680 |
| 9-Nov-03 | ZP | Saracens vs London Irish | 31 - 34 | Vicarage Road | 5013 |
| 26-Oct-03 | ZP | Saracens vs Wasps | 3 - 42 | Vicarage Road | 6950 |
| 5-Oct-03 | ZP | Saracens vs Harlequins | 39 - 33 | Vicarage Road | 6380 |
| 21-Sep-03 | ZP | Saracens vs Leicester | 19 - 19 | Vicarage Road | 7730 |
Of
all the clubs surveyed Saracens are the only ones to have recorded a drop in
attendance during the professional era. Whilst it could be argued that the 97/98
figures were artificially high due to massive promotional spend, giveaway
tickets, etc. the drop in crowds must be an area for some concern for those in
and around the club.
Back
in 1997 there was a lot of ‘new’ money being thrown at rugby union. Inspired
in part by the commercial success that soccer clubs were apparently enjoying,
wealthy individuals bought rugby clubs and set about trying to turn them into
major sporting enterprises. Saracens and their principal shareholder Nigel Wray
are a prime example of this, and the pitfalls involved.
Here is a lesson, if one were needed, that you can use marketing spend to attract an audience, but that if you do not give that audience what it perceives as value for money it will melt away. Lots of hard work goes to waste and money goes down the drain.
Those within the club attribute the fall in crowds to poor on field performance. There may be some merit in that argument but, as can be shown at other clubs, supporters can be persuaded to return even if the offerings on field are disappointing. The financial burden of running Saracens is now being shared between Nigel Wray and a number of other wealthy supporters. Looking at these figures they may need to dig deep into their pockets.
Assuming the crowd growth which has been averaged since the 97/98 season continues this is what we will see in the five seasons to come.
Season
- Attendance
| 04/05 | 7020 |
| 05/06 | 6813 |
| 06/07 | 6612 |
| 07/08 | 6417 |
| 08/09 | 6228 |
Bookmark or share this story with: