We need to get more involved at the breakdown and move the ball out wide a bit faster. We have been playing a bit of rope a dope though. Seen this before. Quins will keep focusing on putting men in the breakdown and we will start popping balls up and playing much faster.
I feel a little vindicated. We looked much the better team in the second half. Still a bit too close but I am fairly happy with our progress. 2 home wins against top teams while playing below our best. Feels like we are building.
Not at the races In that first half. Decent second half with lots of chances missed aswell. 5 point win not playing great yet is positive . I thought munga had another big game. Really showing his worth now .
Thought Iyogun was superb and was unlucky not to get MoM.
Pollock really added some energy.
According to Sam V there was no hairdryer at HT just talked about what went wrong in the 1st half but something fired the forwards up because they were a different pack in that last 40!
I thought Carley had a good game, the difference in the halves was the lack of intensity at the breakdown by Saints in the first half and the vast improvement in that area in the 2nd!
Have just watched the game back, not sure if I am being a bit precious? Around 38:05 on the clock Sam Graham clears out Cunningham South and holds onto his ankle. CS takes umbrage and lifts and batters his head into the ground at least 3 times. Linesman right in front and I saw it live at the ground and thought "that's not right". While Sam was being a bit of a pain I thought the head was sacrosanct and certainly off limits for this sort of thing. Any thoughts?
tigersimon I thought Carley had a good game, the difference in the halves was the lack of intensity at the breakdown by Saints in the first half and the vast improvement in that area in the 2nd!
It was the basic errors that gave Quins so much possession and ill-discipline that gave them territory in the first half. Second half we did increase our intensity but also held on to the ball and were much more accurate.
NobbyClarke Have just watched the game back, not sure if I am being a bit precious? Around 38:05 on the clock Sam Graham clears out Cunningham South and holds onto his ankle. CS takes umbrage and lifts and batters his head into the ground at least 3 times. Linesman right in front and I saw it live at the ground and thought "that's not right". While Sam was being a bit of a pain I thought the head was sacrosanct and certainly off limits for this sort of thing. Any thoughts?
Agreed. My wife saw it live and was incensed. I think it took place in what is a near blind spot for the TMO , although the AR should have been it. CS was niggly all match, but this was out of order.
Edited for spelling
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:10:05:19:21:12 by Sans Culottes.
ajack Players hanging onto their legs at rucks preventing the defender from being involved is one of those things I really wish refs would clamp down on.
It is blatant cheating and the defender has to either just accept it or get penalised for taking some action that looks really bad.
Agreed, however repeated planting of Pearson’s head at a depth suitable for turnips seems over the top.
Edited for spelling
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:10:06:17:21:21 by Sans Culottes.
ajack Players hanging onto their legs at rucks preventing the defender from being involved is one of those things I really wish refs would clamp down on.
It is blatant cheating and the defender has to either just accept it or get penalised for taking some action that looks really bad.
Agreed, however repeated planing to Pearson’s head at a depth suitable for turnips seems over the top.
Agreed but you either accept it, stamp on them, punch them or do something similar to this. If you are repeatedly doing this they are not letting go. If refs clamped down on this it would stop.
Scrumpy Half While Quins third try was clearly forward, I also wonder from the highlights if the lineout was far from straight.
Agree completely. The pass for Quins third try seemed clearly forward to me. For what it's worth, Healey thought it was miles forward, in his words. The problem is they had already were again in a strong attacking position in our 22. And kept coming most of the first half.
But I had also thought there was a lineout throw in the buildup was pretty far off the mark and seemed wide as well.
Saint dolph Anyone else think Hutch has abit more physicality to him this year so far?
Yes. I think his defence has improved enormously in the last two years and he has been excellent all-round so far this season. He's always been an elusive runner, had an eye for a gap and a good pass but now he's carrying well and making his tackles, can see us losing him to Scotland again.
Scrumpy Half And in the footrace he had a couple of yards or so to make up, well so it seemed. It wasn't a 1 in 10 save, seemed a I in a 100, was that good.
Well if we’re brutally critical of him, for the first Smith try he covered the ground across field too quickly forcing the inside step from Smith into the hole created by Hutch not being able to get across the field as quickly as Freemo. Havingn said that I’d rather credit Smith than criticise our boys!
Scrumpy Half And in the footrace he had a couple of yards or so to make up, well so it seemed. It wasn't a 1 in 10 save, seemed a I in a 100, was that good.
Well if we’re brutally critical of him, for the first Smith try he covered the ground across field too quickly forcing the inside step from Smith into the hole created by Hutch not being able to get across the field as quickly as Freemo. Havingn said that I’d rather credit Smith than criticise our boys!
You're only quoting what Healey said in commentary.
To me the tackle was another example of the quality we've come to expect from him.
Scrumpy Half And in the footrace he had a couple of yards or so to make up, well so it seemed. It wasn't a 1 in 10 save, seemed a I in a 100, was that good.
Well if we’re brutally critical of him, for the first Smith try he covered the ground across field too quickly forcing the inside step from Smith into the hole created by Hutch not being able to get across the field as quickly as Freemo. Havingn said that I’d rather credit Smith than criticise our boys!
You're only quoting what Healey said in commentary.
To me the tackle was another example of the quality we've come to expect from him.
Not sure that is true he did give Smith the option to cut inside which he shouldn't have done but Smith does have one of the best steps in the premiership and if you give him that much space he would be a real test for any player. I dont think that detracts from the excellence in holding Joseph up over the line.
I think virtually no player in the world stops Smith there, as soon as you've let him run at a defence that spaced out trying to cover across half the pitch you're dead - if Freeman slows up a little to keep connected to his inside man coming across and Smith accelerates away and round him.
Freeman's only real weakness in relative terms is his initial pace because he's tall and relatively heavy. When he started running back I thought Joseph had him on toast because he's much quicker in those first few yards.... then the stride gets going and he eats up the ground and has the composure and power for that tackle.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment.
We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals.
We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards.
If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing
abuse@sportnetwork.net