Exeter Chiefs
Cornish Pirates v Exeter Chiefs (PRC)
By thechiefstribe.com
October 31 2024
TEAMS, MATCH INFORMATION, PRE-MATCH DISCUSSION THREAD AND SCORE PREDICTION
Please post your score predictions in this thread
Digg
Delicious
Facebook
Reddit
StumbleuponCornish Pirates v Exeter Chiefs (PRC)
Discussion started by thechiefstribe.com (IP Logged), 31/10/2024 10:18
31/10/2024 10:18
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
I remember going to Twickenham and them beating us in the final there so lets be very wary of this game!
Quote:fisher
I remember going to Twickenham and them beating us in the final there so lets be very wary of this game!
When did that happen, Fisher? I can't remember.
Cueto wasn't in touch, at least in my dreams.
Exeter Chiefs:
15 Josh Hodge
14 Paul Brown-Bampoe
13 Ben Hammersley
12 Will Rigg
11 Tommy Wyatt
10 Will Haydon-Wood
9 Will Becconsall
1 Will Goodrick-Clarke
2 Dan Frost
3 Ehren Painter
4 Rusi Tuima
5 Lewis Pearson
6 Ethan Roots
7 Jacques Vermeulen (c)
8 Greg Fisilau
Replacements:
16 Jack Innard
17 Kwenzo Blose
18 Jimmy Roots
19 Joe Bailey
20 Martin Moloney
21 Stu Townsend
22 Harvey Skinner
23 Joe Hawkins
15 Josh Hodge
14 Paul Brown-Bampoe
13 Ben Hammersley
12 Will Rigg
11 Tommy Wyatt
10 Will Haydon-Wood
9 Will Becconsall
1 Will Goodrick-Clarke
2 Dan Frost
3 Ehren Painter
4 Rusi Tuima
5 Lewis Pearson
6 Ethan Roots
7 Jacques Vermeulen (c)
8 Greg Fisilau
Replacements:
16 Jack Innard
17 Kwenzo Blose
18 Jimmy Roots
19 Joe Bailey
20 Martin Moloney
21 Stu Townsend
22 Harvey Skinner
23 Joe Hawkins
Cornish Pirates:
15 Iwan Price-Thomas
14 Matt McNab
13 Tom Georgiou
12 Joe Elderkin
11 Arthur Relton
10 Bruce Houston
9 Dan Hiscocks;
1 Billy Keast
2 Harry Hocking
3 Jay Tyack
4 Charlie Rice
5 Eoin O’Connor
6 Josh King
7 Will Gibson
8 gHugh Bokenham (captain).
Replacements:
16 Sol Moody
17 Billy Young
18 Ollie Andrews
19 Matt Cannon
20 Tomi Agbongbon
21 Cam Jones
22 Iwan Jenkins
23 Will Trewin
15 Iwan Price-Thomas
14 Matt McNab
13 Tom Georgiou
12 Joe Elderkin
11 Arthur Relton
10 Bruce Houston
9 Dan Hiscocks;
1 Billy Keast
2 Harry Hocking
3 Jay Tyack
4 Charlie Rice
5 Eoin O’Connor
6 Josh King
7 Will Gibson
8 gHugh Bokenham (captain).
Replacements:
16 Sol Moody
17 Billy Young
18 Ollie Andrews
19 Matt Cannon
20 Tomi Agbongbon
21 Cam Jones
22 Iwan Jenkins
23 Will Trewin
Match Officials
Referee: Sara Cox
Assistant Referees: Iain Kiy and Kevin Williams
Referee: Sara Cox
Assistant Referees: Iain Kiy and Kevin Williams
Weather Forecast as at 1200 Thursday
Partly cloudy and light winds from the east northeast
Temperature 12 degrees
Precipitation is not expected
Partly cloudy and light winds from the east northeast
Temperature 12 degrees
Precipitation is not expected
TV Coverage
Not on regular TV but understand Pirates are streaming it at a cost of £7.
Not on regular TV but understand Pirates are streaming it at a cost of £7.
Wyatt 11 and Hammersley 13? Surely that'd be better switched around, put the more creative player where he can be effective and let Hammersley use his pace.
We should win this one, but it may be closer than we'd like.
Pirates 22 Chiefs 29
We should win this one, but it may be closer than we'd like.
Pirates 22 Chiefs 29
There are at least 8 chiefs or ex chiefs in that Pirates team. Its almost like a training run out.
I like our selection, which stays in the spirit of the competition despite so many first team names...😄
This competition comes at the perfect time imo. Time to take the shackles off, play with some confidence and nothing really to lose. It could define what happens later in the season.
17 Pirates 43 Chiefs.
I like our selection, which stays in the spirit of the competition despite so many first team names...😄
This competition comes at the perfect time imo. Time to take the shackles off, play with some confidence and nothing really to lose. It could define what happens later in the season.
17 Pirates 43 Chiefs.
According to the Pirates website, in line with Premiership Cup regulations the game won't be live streamed 😞
Exeter Chiefs - living the dream!
Thoughts are like arrows: once released , they strike their mark. Guard them well or one day you may be your own victim
Exeter Chiefs - living the dream!
Thoughts are like arrows: once released , they strike their mark. Guard them well or one day you may be your own victim
OK, with that lineup we certainly mean business. Briefly considered going to this one as I'm due to cross the Taimar myself tomorrow but probably more trouble than it's worth.
Will lean towards optimism. Pirates 20 Chiefs 30
Will lean towards optimism. Pirates 20 Chiefs 30
I think very different from prem teams we normally select. This is very much the sort of team we select for all our prem games. Not sure what I think of that. Who is defining their tactics and selected that squad. Pleased Wyatt is starting. We should win easily but not sure , unlike NM, how it will affect the rest of the season. Pirates 27 Chiefs 36
Really hope the defence has nothing to do! Attack, attack, attack!
Pirates 15 : Chiefs 40
In Rob we trust.
By the way - cream on first. There's nothing to debate.
Pirates 15 : Chiefs 40
In Rob we trust.
By the way - cream on first. There's nothing to debate.
Surely, FINALLY, a much coveted win is beckoning.
Pirates 22 - 31 Chiefs.
Cueto wasn't in touch, at least in my dreams.
Pirates 22 - 31 Chiefs.
Cueto wasn't in touch, at least in my dreams.
Quote:StanWilks
Surely, FINALLY, a much coveted win is beckoning.
Pirates 22 - 31 Chiefs.
I hope not too 'FINALLY' Stan! I'd like to think it's the beginning of something special!🤞
In Rob we trust.
By the way - cream on first. There's nothing to debate.
Simply a must win game. Great to see Wyatt back, wasted on the wing, full back or centre for me. Treatment of Hawkins bizarre to say the least, but not surprised given recent selections by coaches.
We will need to score a few tries as our back line looks very weak defensively without Skinner starting.
Pirates 24 Chiefs 31
We will need to score a few tries as our back line looks very weak defensively without Skinner starting.
Pirates 24 Chiefs 31
Quote:DumnoniiNomadQuote:StanWilks
Surely, FINALLY, a much coveted win is beckoning.
Pirates 22 - 31 Chiefs.
I hope not too 'FINALLY' Stan! I'd like to think it's the beginning of something special!🤞
One can only hope, NM!
Quote:cornwallchief
I think very different from prem teams we normally select. This is very much the sort of team we select for all our prem games. Not sure what I think of that. Who is defining their tactics and selected that squad. Pleased Wyatt is starting. We should win easily but not sure , unlike NM, how it will affect the rest of the season. Pirates 27 Chiefs 36
I'd presume that Baxter and co. are selecting a near identical Premiership 23 in the hopes that they can learn how to win again.
In which case, they have my full support and understanding. A series of wins, despite being against supposedly weaker opposition, could be just what this team needs.
Great to see Wyatt back, he was going great guns before his injury last season. A strong Chiefs team, going with a win for us.
Chiefs 33 Pirates 24
Chiefs 33 Pirates 24
Quote:Not Manichean
I like our selection, which stays in the spirit of the competition despite so many first team names...😄
Quote:I am sure you are correct Stan; that is what the coaches are aiming for . I think the huge downside is the lack of any gametime to show what any of the other younger members of the squad can do. If we win I am not sure we will learn much - a loss means wasted opportunities for others. Its almost as if the coaches still think this is the best team they can find in our huge squad despite deteriorating performances and not winning a game all season. There is no transitioning in this squad.StanWilksQuote:cornwallchief
I think very different from prem teams we normally select. This is very much the sort of team we select for all our prem games. Not sure what I think of that. Who is defining their tactics and selected that squad. Pleased Wyatt is starting. We should win easily but not sure , unlike NM, how it will affect the rest of the season. Pirates 27 Chiefs 36
I'd presume that Baxter and co. are selecting a near identical Premiership 23 in the hopes that they can learn how to win again.
In which case, they have my full support and understanding. A series of wins, despite being against supposedly weaker opposition, could be just what this team needs.
Quote:cornwallchiefQuote:I am sure you are correct Stan; that is what the coaches are aiming for . I think the huge downside is the lack of any gametime to show what any of the other younger members of the squad can do. If we win I am not sure we will learn much - a loss means wasted opportunities for others. Its almost as if the coaches still think this is the best team they can find in our huge squad despite deteriorating performances and not winning a game all season. There is no transitioning in this squad.StanWilksQuote:cornwallchief
I think very different from prem teams we normally select. This is very much the sort of team we select for all our prem games. Not sure what I think of that. Who is defining their tactics and selected that squad. Pleased Wyatt is starting. We should win easily but not sure , unlike NM, how it will affect the rest of the season. Pirates 27 Chiefs 36
I'd presume that Baxter and co. are selecting a near identical Premiership 23 in the hopes that they can learn how to win again.
In which case, they have my full support and understanding. A series of wins, despite being against supposedly weaker opposition, could be just what this team needs.
That is the other side of the coin, indeed. I'm surprised to see Jimmy Roots in there, to be honest.
Perhaps Hartpury at home will be a better opportunity for our peripheral squad members to earn some time in the saddle.
I'm standing by my prediction that we'll have a terrific Prem Cup campaign, and maybe even win it despite our torrid domestic form - very much like Gloucester last season!
Cueto wasn't in touch, at least in my dreams.
I think the boys will excel so a win 33- 19 well i have just had a Guinness
I think that last week’s squad thought they were going to get a week off but, after last week’s poor showing they have been given a “go out and get yourselves sorted” talk.
No disrespect to Pirates but expect a win by 38 - 17.
No disrespect to Pirates but expect a win by 38 - 17.
Brilliant to see Wyatt back, but why on the wing ??????????
Do the coaches not see what everyone else sees, he is probably the most talented playmaker we have at the club, along with Slade.
Never going to happen because of Slade's England contract, but I would play Slade at 10 and Wyatt at 13.
Do the coaches not see what everyone else sees, he is probably the most talented playmaker we have at the club, along with Slade.
Never going to happen because of Slade's England contract, but I would play Slade at 10 and Wyatt at 13.
That's a very strong side for a prem cup game. Probably the strongest pack we've put out all year. I can understand why we've done it, but imagine the embarrassment and confidence drop if we lose! I don't think we will though
Corns 19 Chiefs 42
Great to see Pearson and Wyatt back.
Corns 19 Chiefs 42
Great to see Pearson and Wyatt back.
Quote:Big Chief Little Chief
That's a very strong side for a prem cup game. Probably the strongest pack we've put out all year. I can understand why we've done it, but imagine the embarrassment and confidence drop if we lose! I don't think we will though
Corns 19 Chiefs 42
Great to see Pearson and Wyatt back.
I don't know why you're surprised, you guys always go full strength in the Prem Cup. It's hilarious.
Quote:Big Chief Little Chief
That's a very strong side for a prem cup game. Probably the strongest pack we've put out all year. I can understand why we've done it, but imagine the embarrassment and confidence drop if we lose! I don't think we will though
Corns 19 Chiefs 42
Great to see Pearson and Wyatt back.
Agree. We've missed Pearson in the pack this season more than most realise. Before Wyatt was injured about a year ago, he was leading the Prem for a number of statistics including defenders beaten. Really pleased to see them both back in the squad.
[quote StanWilks][quote fisher]I remember going to Twickenham and them beating us in the final there so lets be very wary of this game![/quote]
When did that happen, Fisher? I can't remember. [www.bbc.co.uk].
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:11:01:14:12:17 by 4everchief.
When did that happen, Fisher? I can't remember. [www.bbc.co.uk].
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:11:01:14:12:17 by 4everchief.
[quote 4everchief][quote StanWilks][quote fisher]I remember going to Twickenham and them beating us in the final there so lets be very wary of this game![/quote]
When did that happen, Fisher? I can't remember. [www.bbc.co.uk].[/quote]
Thank you for taking the time to link that, my friend. A very good read!
Cueto wasn't in touch, at least in my dreams.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:11:01:14:13:46 by StanWilks.
When did that happen, Fisher? I can't remember. [www.bbc.co.uk].[/quote]
Thank you for taking the time to link that, my friend. A very good read!
Cueto wasn't in touch, at least in my dreams.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:11:01:14:13:46 by StanWilks.
Is there any way of following the match via streaming or Radio?
Its hardly surprising that club rugby struggles to attract a new audience when even those who are already interested can't follow the sport.
Its hardly surprising that club rugby struggles to attract a new audience when even those who are already interested can't follow the sport.
Quote:Not Manichean
Is there any way of following the match via streaming or Radio?
Its hardly surprising that club rugby struggles to attract a new audience when even those who are already interested can't follow the sport.
Apparently the Pirates were told by the RFU that they weren't allowed to, at least from what I saw on Twitter posted by Tribe Talking. Or it could be due to TNT choosing what they want to broadcast.
Cueto wasn't in touch, at least in my dreams.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024:11:01:14:26:30 by StanWilks.
Quote:Not Manichean
Is there any way of following the match via streaming or Radio?
Its hardly surprising that club rugby struggles to attract a new audience when even those who are already interested can't follow the sport.
Apart from the goodwill of our Twitter/X hero, I don't think we'll know until it's over ... Very sad.
In Rob we trust.
By the way - cream on first. There's nothing to debate.
Quote:Tiverton Brave
Radio Devon has it scheduled for tonight.
As does Radio Cornwall... both have sport programmes running from 7pm featuring it.
Thanks for the responses.
But if its true that the RFU overruled a Pirates YouTube stream, that is just more evidence of the short sighted ineptitude of our rugby authorities. Is it any wonder that the game struggles.
But if its true that the RFU overruled a Pirates YouTube stream, that is just more evidence of the short sighted ineptitude of our rugby authorities. Is it any wonder that the game struggles.
Quote:Not Manichean
But if its true that the RFU overruled a Pirates YouTube stream, that is just more evidence of the short sighted ineptitude of our rugby authorities. Is it any wonder that the game struggles.
Some random message board dweller like you would be far better at running the game.
I think keeping TNT happy and getting them to continue to invest in the game, is far more important to the future of the sport than if a Pirates YouTube stream exists or not.
Quote:BallsyQuote:Not Manichean
But if its true that the RFU overruled a Pirates YouTube stream, that is just more evidence of the short sighted ineptitude of our rugby authorities. Is it any wonder that the game struggles.
Some random message board dweller like you would be far better at running the game.
I think keeping TNT happy and getting them to continue to invest in the game, is far more important to the future of the sport than if a Pirates YouTube stream exists or not.
As you’re obviously a Chiefs hater, why don’t you ef off and post your insults elsewhere. They’ve become very tiresome.
Quote:BallsyQuote:Not Manichean
But if its true that the RFU overruled a Pirates YouTube stream, that is just more evidence of the short sighted ineptitude of our rugby authorities. Is it any wonder that the game struggles.
Some random message board dweller like you would be far better at running the game.
I think keeping TNT happy and getting them to continue to invest in the game, is far more important to the future of the sport than if a Pirates YouTube stream exists or not.
Technically speaking, it's more important that fans are kept happy because we vote with our wallets. All we have to do is cancel our subscriptions and suddenly TNT will think twice about owning the broadcasting rights.
Since he's now moved on from just being a WUM to insulting another poster, ballsy is now on a warning. Any more comments like that and you're banned.
Quote:StanWilksQuote:BallsyQuote:Not Manichean
But if its true that the RFU overruled a Pirates YouTube stream, that is just more evidence of the short sighted ineptitude of our rugby authorities. Is it any wonder that the game struggles.
Some random message board dweller like you would be far better at running the game.
I think keeping TNT happy and getting them to continue to invest in the game, is far more important to the future of the sport than if a Pirates YouTube stream exists or not.
Technically speaking, it's more important that fans are kept happy because we vote with our wallets. All we have to do is cancel our subscriptions and suddenly TNT will think twice about owning the broadcasting rights.
How does Pirates not having a YouTube stream make you want to cancel your TNT subscription? If anything the opposite is more likely.
Quote:BallsyQuote:StanWilksQuote:BallsyQuote:Not Manichean
But if its true that the RFU overruled a Pirates YouTube stream, that is just more evidence of the short sighted ineptitude of our rugby authorities. Is it any wonder that the game struggles.
Some random message board dweller like you would be far better at running the game.
I think keeping TNT happy and getting them to continue to invest in the game, is far more important to the future of the sport than if a Pirates YouTube stream exists or not.
Technically speaking, it's more important that fans are kept happy because we vote with our wallets. All we have to do is cancel our subscriptions and suddenly TNT will think twice about owning the broadcasting rights.
How does Pirates not having a YouTube stream make you want to cancel your TNT subscription? If anything the opposite is more likely.
I actually don't have TNT because it's exorbitant, but I was just thinking of those who pay that enormous bill for access to rugby that doesn't include every game.
Quote:Not Manichean
Thanks for the responses.
But if its true that the RFU overruled a Pirates YouTube stream, that is just more evidence of the short sighted ineptitude of our rugby authorities. Is it any wonder that the game struggles.
If the money isn't going toward the tea and biscuits fund at Twickenham, it mustn't be made by anyone. Wouldn't be surprised if the camerawork and broadcast quality is better than Premier Sports either.
Quote:BallsyQuote:Not Manichean
But if its true that the RFU overruled a Pirates YouTube stream, that is just more evidence of the short sighted ineptitude of our rugby authorities. Is it any wonder that the game struggles.
Some random message board dweller like you would be far better at running the game.
I think keeping TNT happy and getting them to continue to invest in the game, is far more important to the future of the sport than if a Pirates YouTube stream exists or not.
Firstly, it was PRL that negotiated the TV deal with TNT, and it is pretty widely acknowledged that the negotiations have been poorly managed for many years now.
Secondly whilst a deal that allows TNT to choose which Premiership Cup matches it wants to televise may be fine, a deal which prohibits clubs from streaming the other matches clearly isn't.
Thirdly, it has been reported that the RFU overruled Pirates streaming the match. I have no idea whether that is true, but if so, it contradicts the RFUs own mission statement and core values.
Finally if you really believe that the rugby authorities are managing the sport well in England then your opinion is probably a lot more random than mine.
I have no idea what satisfaction you get from trolling these boards but it certainly at odds with the spirit and values of the game as I have enjoyed them as a player, spectator and supporter for over fifty years. Which makes me think that you can't ever have played, you don't actually love the sport and certainly don't understand it.
Well said NM it is just a wind up merchant that is probably threehalf pence short of a shilling!!
Chiefs leading 40-7 at halftime. Brown Bampoe and will Rigg. boh have a brace. Sounds good on the radio commentary.
It's a shame anyone has to spell out the facts to an evidently stupid and ignorant poster who has been barred numerous times, but failed to learn that his contributions are not appreciated. On this occasion, thanks NM
In Rob we trust.
By the way - cream on first. There's nothing to debate.
In Rob we trust.
By the way - cream on first. There's nothing to debate.
I'm not sure what that result really proves. But it certainly is good for confidence and should hopefully change mindsets.
It certainly won't have done Ricky Pellows prospects any harm.
It certainly won't have done Ricky Pellows prospects any harm.
Glad to see us win regardless of the circumstances.
Anyone in the mood for a rugby meme?
Here's one I made celebrating the result: Chiefs Finally Won A Game! | MEME.MP4
Anyone in the mood for a rugby meme?
Here's one I made celebrating the result: Chiefs Finally Won A Game! | MEME.MP4
Quote:Not ManicheanQuote:BallsyQuote:Not Manichean
But if its true that the RFU overruled a Pirates YouTube stream, that is just more evidence of the short sighted ineptitude of our rugby authorities. Is it any wonder that the game struggles.
Some random message board dweller like you would be far better at running the game.
I think keeping TNT happy and getting them to continue to invest in the game, is far more important to the future of the sport than if a Pirates YouTube stream exists or not.
Firstly, it was PRL that negotiated the TV deal with TNT, and it is pretty widely acknowledged that the negotiations have been poorly managed for many years now.
Secondly whilst a deal that allows TNT to choose which Premiership Cup matches it wants to televise may be fine, a deal which prohibits clubs from streaming the other matches clearly isn't.
Thirdly, it has been reported that the RFU overruled Pirates streaming the match. I have no idea whether that is true, but if so, it contradicts the RFUs own mission statement and core values.
Finally if you really believe that the rugby authorities are managing the sport well in England then your opinion is probably a lot more random than mine.
I have no idea what satisfaction you get from trolling these boards but it certainly at odds with the spirit and values of the game as I have enjoyed them as a player, spectator and supporter for over fifty years. Which makes me think that you can't ever have played, you don't actually love the sport and certainly don't understand it.
Firstly, who exactly has acknowledged that PRL have been so poor at negotiating TV deals?
Secondly, if TNT have paid for the broadcasting rights then absolutely they are entitled to prevent anyone else from streaming games. Are you really suggesting that anyone should be allowed to broadcast any sport regardless of who legally owns the rights to do so?
Thirdly, of course the RFU would have advised that because they know it would contravene TNT's contract so they would be obligated to protect Pirates from legal action.
BB
BB - If TNT have no intent in broadcasting a specific game, then in the interest of promoting the sport, other options should be available to clubs. I don't think anybody is suggesting they should be able to duplicate what's already being provided by the contracted partner.
If this is not an option, then that would suggest the negotiation of the contract was not as thorough as it should have been.
In Rob we trust.
By the way - cream on first. There's nothing to debate.
If this is not an option, then that would suggest the negotiation of the contract was not as thorough as it should have been.
In Rob we trust.
By the way - cream on first. There's nothing to debate.
[quote DumnoniiNomad]BB - If TNT have no intent in broadcasting a specific game, then in the interest of promoting the sport, other options should be available to clubs./quote]
That's not how business/the real world works.
Anyway, congratulations on your 1st team demolishing Cornish Pirates. You guys must be so proud. No wonder your younger players are a bit useless when you never play them in this competition like the rest of the Prem does.
That's not how business/the real world works.
Anyway, congratulations on your 1st team demolishing Cornish Pirates. You guys must be so proud. No wonder your younger players are a bit useless when you never play them in this competition like the rest of the Prem does.
Quote:DumnoniiNomad
BB - If TNT have no intent in broadcasting a specific game, then in the interest of promoting the sport, other options should be available to clubs. I don't think anybody is suggesting they should be able to duplicate what's already being provided by the contracted partner.
If this is not an option, then that would suggest the negotiation of the contract was not as thorough as it should have been.
Seriously? Who has ever negotiated a contract which allows anyone to provide competing coverage of a different game in the same competition to the one being broadcast by the company paying for that right?
BB
Whilst I'm inclined to agree with you BB, I thought the choice of the match TNT chose to show last night was odd. If you subscribe to TNT you can watch Tigers v Saints a couple of times a season; it would have been nice of TNT to show teams who aren't on there every week. I'm not suggesting it had to be Chiefs but there were two other games on last night that involved Championship sides. It may be that the negotiations didn't ensure they got a cut of the TV money (which, as PRL were involved, it's quite likely they don't), so there's no incentive to show the Championship sides.
Quote:Brown BottleQuote:DumnoniiNomad
BB - If TNT have no intent in broadcasting a specific game, then in the interest of promoting the sport, other options should be available to clubs. I don't think anybody is suggesting they should be able to duplicate what's already being provided by the contracted partner.
If this is not an option, then that would suggest the negotiation of the contract was not as thorough as it should have been.
Seriously? Who has ever negotiated a contract which allows anyone to provide competing coverage of a different game in the same competition to the one being broadcast by the company paying for that right?
Yes - YouTube would only attract the die hard supporter who probably wouldn't be interested in the televised option anyway.
In Rob we trust.
By the way - cream on first. There's nothing to debate.
Don’t forget that Penzance is a long way to haul all the requisite broadcasting kit, so maybe showing a match closer to home was the easy option for TNT!
Quote:ouch!_that_hurts
Whilst I'm inclined to agree with you BB, I thought the choice of the match TNT chose to show last night was odd. If you subscribe to TNT you can watch Tigers v Saints a couple of times a season; it would have been nice of TNT to show teams who aren't on there every week. I'm not suggesting it had to be Chiefs but there were two other games on last night that involved Championship sides. It may be that the negotiations didn't ensure they got a cut of the TV money (which, as PRL were involved, it's quite likely they don't), so there's no incentive to show the Championship sides.
It does seem strange but maybe, and I'm guessing, the championship teams don't want their home games televised to maximise gate receipts.
BB
Quote:SixNineOne
Don’t forget that Penzance is a long way to haul all the requisite broadcasting kit, so maybe showing a match closer to home was the easy option for TNT!
Quite possibly with Crew & Equipment off to Twickenham today.
Finally get a Championship side televised next weekend but clashes with Ireland v New Zealand!
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
