By Chris O'Brien
October 5 2009
Rugby League’s play-off system has always attracted controversy. Dwindling attendances continue to raise legitimate questions about the end-of-season event, whilst it’s easy to see the problems in a system where the well-deserving league champions do not necessarily win the competition. However, the current system is one which the RFL can be justly proud of.
In most respects, I understand why the play-offs have been
subject of much derision from some quarters. Certainly, it's easy to ridicule a
system where a team that stutter to an eighth-placed finish could still win the
competition over an all-conquering league champion.
However, the Super League clearly needs to embrace some form
of play-off system. Rugby League in this country has been victim to unpredictable
gates for years so the competition needs a format that maintains a degree of
excitement for clubs who may not be challenging at the right end of the
division.
The play-offs do just that.
Though the abandonment of relegation has zapped some of the
drama from the bottom of the league (though who are we to complain!),
qualification for the new eight-team play-off system kept things exciting for
every team in the league - except Salford and the Saders - right up until the
final hurdles of this summer's campaign.
Also, far from being a move against the sport's traditions,
British rugby league has almost always embraced some form of play-off series. A
four-placed play-off system was in place as early as 1903; the end of season Premiership
system was launched in the mid-1970s and the Super League competition has always
relied on play-off drama.
In recent years there has also been an increasing emphasis
placed on the importance of the League Leader's Shield. Re-introduced in 2003
as something of an after-thought, the honour now carries immense importance.
Anybody who watched Leeds and St Helens tear
lumps out of eachother for eighty minutes will know just how much significance
the Hubcap now carries. There is, therefore, a decent reward in place for the top-placed
team as well as the Grand Final winners.
For me, the introduction of the ‘ClubCall' system for 2009
is an excellent move from the game's authorities. This allows the highest
ranked first-week winners to choose their opponents in the semi-final and saw
the Rhinos choose season-travellers Catalans over Wigan
this year. This adds spice and provides further reward for the more consistent
achievers over the regular season.
As many commentators have suggested, the innovative idea is
one which other sports could well take advantage of. The Football League, for
example, could do a lot worse than introduce the system which would give a
worthwhile advantage to those clubs who have achieved better results over the
duration of the campaign. As it stands, bar home advantage in the second-leg,
no such advantage exists.
The play-off system will continue to cause controversy and, certainly, dwindling gates are a concern. 8,689 watched Wigan's elimination play-off win over Castleford, despite the presence of a sizeable away following. That gate was significantly lower than, for example, the 12,371 that watched Wigan thump the Saders earlier in the season. Whilst that, however, is an issue with season tickets benefits, pricing and over-bearing TV coverage, the play-off system is one the league can be rightly proud of.
