The Rugby Football Union has requested a meeting with the Chairman and Chief Executive of Premier Rugby Ltd next week to discuss yesterday's announcement by PRL, made at the conclusion of the club Chairmen & Shareholders meeting, which included proposed changes to the agreed structured season.
RFU
Statement
on
Premier Rugby shareholders' announcement
The RFU supports Premier Rugby's plans to bring its cost base into line
with revised revenue projections likely during the recession but it is
concerned at the reported plans to increase the number of Guinness
Premiership matches and the apparent withdrawal by Premier Rugby from the
proposed successor tournament to the EDF Energy Cup.
The RFU will be requesting clarification and further detail on these
reported proposals prior to their presentation to the scheduled
Professional Game Board meeting on January 22. It is important that any
such proposals are in accord with the terms of the new eight year RFU/PRL
agreement signed in October 2007 and which has started well since it took
effect in July 2008.
Martyn Thomas, Chairman of the RFU Management Board, said: "We
understand that these are difficult times for all clubs, professional and
community. It is important that all clubs budget carefully and prudently
during the current major recession. However, we must ensure that we
maintain the stability of our playing structures and continue to deliver
on player welfare issues.
"We are looking forward to receiving the
detail of their proposals from Premier Rugby next week. These will be
discussed by the Professional Game Board on January 22 and the RFU
Management Board on January 28."
The RFU weren't really overly concerned about "maintaining the stability of playing structures" when they railroaded the 12-team Championship proposal through, were they?
Totally agree. The RFU should keep their noses out of the GP and concentrate on their own patch.
Generally it would be fair to say that you get a much clearer view of the abilities of a company, manager, rugby player. Anything or anyone operating in a competitive environment really, when things are not going your way.
Its easy when things are running smoothly.
The National side has been badly malfunctioning for close on 6 years now.
The top end of the game is under the control by the RFU yet we have as far as Im aware we have heard not one peep from this organisation about the mess over which they preside or what they are doing about it.
Apart from Rob Andrews pathetic attempt to blame Clive Woodward last year.
Question: 1 so are the GP clubs not members of the RFU then?
-----"-: 2 Why should the governing body not question the GP?
---"---: 3 Are not the players members of the Union paying their annual subs
The GP Clubs are not revolving around themselves (many fans would prefer that of course) they are part of the Rugby Football Union of Clubs whether you like it or not
The only answer would be to break away
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2009:01:18:14:19:17 by Kath..
for over a hundered years the football league ran the top four divisions whilst all their members were also in the FA, what's wrong with rugby running under similar lines?
I'm not sure more GP games instead of the anglo-welsh cup is actually a good thing, especially as the clubs sunk their own boat by picking cr@p sides in the old Anglo-Welsh.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment.
We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals.
We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards.
If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing
abuse@sportnetwork.net