Scathing Report on Finances


By Buzzed Off
January 17 2023

Wasps' financial downfall is directly linked to the  "disastrous and ill-thought-through relocation to Coventry" according to a report on the finances of Premiership rugby by the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) select committee 

Damian Green, the Chair of the Committee, said elite club rugby is in disarray.

He also widened the blame saying:  "Inert leadership from the Rugby Foootbal and Premiership Rugby has allowed mismanagement to collapse two of English rugby's top teams. Thousands of loyal fans have been deprived of their clubs and hundreds of jobs have been lost."

The average loss of a Premiership club is now  £4m with a lack of safeguard at the highest level.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Government Press Release

 The financial demise of Worcester Warriors and Wasps is a “stain on the reputation” of the Rugby Football Union (RFU) and Premiership Rugby Limited (PRL), MPs say today, in a report that concludes that poor oversight from the sport’s governing bodies contributed to the clubs’ collapses.

The DCMS Committee criticises a “lack of safeguards in place at the highest levels of the game” to prevent the issues seen at Wasps and Worcester Warriors. When Worcester Warriors collapsed, accounts had not been filed for more than a year, with reports of player salaries being paid late from May, while problems at Wasps had been mounting for years.

The report concludes that, at Wasps, debt from a disastrous and ill-though-through relocation to Coventry crippled the club financially. At Worcester Warriors, unscrupulous owners mismanaged club finances while attempting to strip the club of its assets. Neither the RFU nor the PRL intervened when Colin Goldring was barred from working for any legal firm without the explicit permission of the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

While the Committee welcomes reforms aimed at preventing problems for clubs in the future, the report raises concerns about the future of Premiership finances, warning that the financial situation of Premiership teams is “clearly unsustainable” with annual losses averaging about £4 million per club. MPs are critical of the RFU and PRL’s “complacent belief” that their plans to increase revenues and improve collaboration will solve rugby’s financial problems.

DCMS Committee Acting Chair Damian Green MP said:

“Club rugby at the top of the game is in disarray. Inert leadership from the RFU and PRL has allowed mismanagement to collapse two of English rugby’s top teams. Thousands of loyal fans have been deprived of their clubs and hundreds of jobs have been lost.

We welcome the raft of changes announced by the PRL and RFU. Better safeguards and a stronger owners’ and directors’ test are desperately needed. But it’s incredibly disappointing that two clubs had to collapse for the rugby governing bodies to act.

More worryingly, the root of the problem remains. Rugby clubs are still spiraling into debt and the RFU and PRL’s current revenue boosting plans haven’t done enough in the past and are unlikely to make a difference going forward. With its upcoming annual report, the RFU must demonstrate to the Committee how it will protect the rest of the league from financial ruin.”

Main conclusions and recommendations

  • The financial situation of Premiership clubs is unsustainable. Further growth in club revenues is unlikely to solve these problems.
  • The demise of two Premiership clubs is a stain on the reputation of the RFU and PRL. The planned reforms are welcome, but such alarming circumstances should not have been necessary for the RFU and PRL to act.
  • It is vital that player welfare becomes the central concern of the authorities going forward, with the introduction of a form of benevolent fund a pressing need.
  • When the annual report is published that the RFU must write to the DCMS Committee with a detailed commentary of its financial position and what steps it will be taking to ensure that other clubs don’t face similar crises.

The Committee took evidence from the RFU, Premiership Rugby and others in November.

 

 

Bookmark or share this story with:

Scathing Report on Finances
Discussion started by DrunkenWasps.com , 17/01/2023 10:27
DrunkenWasps.com
17/01/2023 10:27
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.

neils
17/01/2023 10:36
How about a link - or is that taken from the little press coverage so far (10.30am).

Petergwilson
17/01/2023 13:10
And what makes a bunch of self serving MPs think they know best.

neils
17/01/2023 13:30
Quote:
Petergwilson
And what makes a bunch of self serving MPs think they know best.

All clubs took DCMS money and most haven't paid it back - plus most clubs owe HMRC buckets loads. Quite right to look into it. The game could not survive without handouts - it is financially bankrupt.

Petergwilson
17/01/2023 19:38
So a group of MPs is the right way to look into it. I’d have thought a group of financial experts might have been better.

neils
17/01/2023 20:17
Quote:
Petergwilson
So a group of MPs is the right way to look into it. I’d have thought a group of financial experts might have been better.

Not saying it is the right way BUT they do have the "right" to look into it. Also the HMRC experts (yes they do have experts) will be all over this but unfortunately we are unlikely to hear much about that.

ukms
17/01/2023 21:59
Quote:
Petergwilson
So a group of MPs is the right way to look into it. I’d have thought a group of financial experts might have been better.

It’s one way to look into it and the more that do the better.

welsh wasp
18/01/2023 18:01
The culture committee seems to have done a good job of reviewing what happened (not that it helped Wasps). In particular, they also focussed on what the RFU and PRL didn't do. Those two organisations need to consider what didn't do and make some decisions on how much information they should be collecting from individual clubs. They were remiss with Saracens and they were remiss with Wasps and Worcester. Plus looking at what was happening in other sports which might have relevance to rugby union. Football has had a number of cases of owners who bought (usually) a lower division club and then made a mess of it; Derby is not the only good example.
I suspect the RFU will be too busy focussing on the World Cup for the next year because they will see that as their priority and hope that the two recent financial scandals go away without them being focussed on for all that they didn't do.

westwaleswasp
18/01/2023 23:09
Quote:
Petergwilson
And what makes a bunch of self serving MPs think they know best.
Probably the facts being obvious in this case.

greenwood
19/01/2023 07:38
Perhaps they should concentrate on getting the Country right first.

covkid1953
25/01/2023 18:29
I disagree.
At the time, with premiership rugby on an ascending course, it made perfect sense. Problem is the cash didn't keep coming, it slowly dried up and the pandemic almost destroyed the division.
The trickle down cash to championship and lower has reduced to punitive levels and premiership greed has brought the game to its knees in England.
It was thought out but rugby doesn't generate the TV audiences it used to.

welsh wasp
25/01/2023 22:08
Too easy to make critical comments about MPs and their knowledge. They will have experts supporting them and, in the end, they seem to have come up with the right conclusions - including noting that the RFU and PRL have not got clean hands in any of these issues.

greenwood
26/01/2023 09:18
Surely the persons who went hunting The Snark.
Bellman, Baker, Banker, Barrister, Beaver, Billiard-marker, Bonnet and Hood maker, Boots, Broker & Butcher would have come up with the correct decision.

Perhaps we could have left The Banker off of the voyage.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2023:01:26:11:55:55 by greenwood.

bigfecker
09/02/2023 14:25
The report seemed fairly accurate to me.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net